Research results communication

Turn supplied trial results into an explainer video

Turn a supplied trial-results summary into an explainer video by pasting the approved finding, its comparison and the limitations needed to interpret it. AutoScribble helps shape the narration into an editable whiteboard script. Keep exact values tied to their context and use the video to explain the result, with the original evidence available separately.

Audience: Research communications teams

Edit your script before generating the video.

Editable starter prompt

Create a 120-second, 16:9 whiteboard explainer for [audience] from our approved trial-results summary. Introduce the study context and comparison before stating [central result]. Preserve supplied units, time points, uncertainty and limitations. Distinguish measured findings from interpretation and possible implications. Do not invent data, charts, participant numbers or treatment recommendations. Use conceptual scenes to explain the comparison; describe any original figure only through the supplied notes. Finish with our agreed conclusion and the route to the complete results. Leave missing context for me to resolve in the draft. [Paste your source material here]

Results communication needs more than a headline. Viewers may need to know who was studied, what was compared and which outcome the statement concerns before the result makes sense. Prepare that context alongside the finding. Keep measured observations, author interpretation and possible implications distinct so the video does not strengthen the conclusion simply by making it shorter.

Prepare a results statement with its context

For each finding you intend to mention, supply the outcome, comparison, time point and units where relevant. Include the uncertainty or qualification in your approved summary, rather than leaving it in a separate document the script cannot see. Choose the central result for this video and remove secondary findings that would interrupt the explanation without changing its meaning.

Describe evidence without manufacturing a chart

Explain what the original chart or table shows using your own approved wording. A whiteboard scene can introduce the comparison or highlight the takeaway, but it should not invent points, bars or experimental images. Keep the original results figure accessible alongside the video when detailed inspection matters. Review any number or visual suggestion against the source before generating.

Give limitations a place in the story

Explain the boundary of the result before moving to possible implications. If the source distinguishes a measured endpoint from a broader outcome, retain that distinction in the narration. End with the agreed conclusion and route to the full report. A two-minute landscape draft should leave enough space for viewers to understand the result without treating every finding as a universal claim.

Illustrative storyboard

A possible scene sequence

A results explanation that gives the finding its necessary context.

  1. Scene 1

    Visual

    A context card names the study and stated comparison.

    Narration

    First, establish what was compared in this study.

  2. Scene 2

    Visual

    The outcome definition appears in the source’s wording.

    Narration

    This is the outcome the selected result describes.

  3. Scene 3

    Visual

    The approved finding is written with its qualification.

    Narration

    Here is the reported result within that context.

  4. Scene 4

    Visual

    A boundary statement links to the full results.

    Narration

    These limits remain important when interpreting the finding.

Example storyboard; your generated video will vary.

Questions

Can I paste a headline result on its own?
Add the comparison and context needed to interpret it. A result without its outcome, units or qualification can lead to a script that sounds more definite than the source.
Will AutoScribble recreate my original results chart?
Do not rely on this text-led workflow for an exact chart. Explain its meaning in the script and keep the original evidence available separately for detailed viewing.
How should I present an inconclusive result?
Use the wording supplied by the research team and preserve its uncertainty. Do not ask the script to invent a stronger conclusion or turn absence of a clear finding into success.

Review the generated wording and visuals before using your video. See pricing and credits.

Related starting points